论侦查人员出庭作证（法学）.pdf

河北大学
硕士学位论文
论侦查人员出庭作证
姓名:李素卿
申请学位级别:硕士
专业:诉讼法学
指导教师:冯惠敏
20100601
摘要
摘要
在西方大多数国家侦查人员以证人身份出庭作证是很正常的,但是在我国,侦查人
员几乎都不出庭作证证,这明显是与世界的法治不相适应。伴随法治国家的逐步建立,
要求侦查人员以证人的身份出庭作证在我国已是必然趋势,并已有理论基础做保障。在
我国有必要建立侦查人员出庭作证制度。
笔者首先从侦查人员的概念界定展开论述,之后对域外相关立法进行了考察,并对
我国侦查人员不出庭作证的现状及原因进行分析。论证了在我国建立侦查人员出庭作证
制度已具备的理论基础,且在我国建立该制度具有的可行性和必要性,侦查人员出庭作
证是提高司法效率的要求,有利于抑制刑讯逼供,有利于提高普通证人出庭作证率。在
我国侦查人员出庭作证不仅是必要的,而且也是可行的,一方面立法及司法实践指明了
趋势,同时侦查人员的职责提供了保障,诉讼模式的重构提供了基础。本文在立足现实
国情并参考国外立法的基础之上提出了构建我国侦查人员出庭作证制度的设想即侦查
人员出庭作证的身份界定,侦查人员出庭作证的情形及例外,侦查人员出庭作证的程序
设置以及保障侦查人员出庭作证的配套措施。以期对我国在立法上构建侦查人员出庭作
证制度有所裨益。

关键词: 刑事诉讼侦查人员出庭作证


I
Abstract
Abstract
Investigators in most countries in the West as a witness to testify are normal, but in our
country, investigators almost never testify .which is clearly patible with the rule of law
in the world. With the gradual establishment of rule of law to require investigators to the
identity of the witness to testify is an inevitable trend in China, and theoretical basis has been
done to protect. In our country there is a need for investigators to testify in court system.
The author first defines the concept from the investigators to start discussion, after the
relevant legislation on the extraterritorial was examined, and investigators did not testify in
our present situation and analysis of the causes. Demonstrated in our investigation staff to
testify in court system has been established with the theoretical basis, and the establishment of
the system in our country with the feasibility and necessity of investigating officers to testify
in court is required to improve judicial efficiency is beneficial to inhibit the torture, there is
help improve the rate of ordinary witnesses. Investigators testify in court in China is not only
necessary but also feasible, on the one hand the legislative and judicial practice of pointing
out the trend, while the duty of investigation has provided a guarantee, litigation model