今立法诉讼与非诉讼相结合的契机,分析我国设立诉前调解制度的可行性,.为设立诉前调解制度奠定坚定的基石。第三章,介绍我国各地区诉前调解的尝试现状,首先从北京、上海和一些诉前调解运用相对完善的地区为例,介绍我国诉前调解的现状;其次通过现状介绍,探讨我国诉前调解运用存在的不足之处。第四章,通过介绍国外典型,以美国的法院附设调解制度、日本调停制度、我国台湾地区的诉前调解制度为例,结合我国现实背景提取其中值得借鉴的经验做法,分析对我国构建诉前调解制度的启示。第五章,阐述我国诉前调解制度的具体构建。首先分析我国诉前调解制度应具备的五个基本原则,其次分析我国诉前调解应该涵盖的适用范围,诉前调解的人员和机构设置,之后分析我国诉前调解应用的具体阶段步骤,最后分析诉前调解制度的调解期限和费用负担、调解协议的效力等方面,探讨我国诉前调解的理性构建。关键词:诉前调解,司法ADR,法院委托诉前调解,plaintbeforemediation”seemsstrange,binghistorycanbeseenitsasymptoticfailureagain,therehasbeenalow—,manyChinesecourtshavebegantotryallkindsoflawsuitbeforemediationmodel,butforlawsuitbefore,usingdifferentunderstandingtothemediationmodelisdiffer,’Scourtonfurtherimplementation¨themediationofpriority,bine"plaintbeforemediationconcept,’’,thispapertheauthortriestoourlawsuitbeforebasictheoreticalissuesofmediation,summarizesourcountrybeforepracticeandmediationlawsuitpatternclassification,Thenin—depthanalysislawsuitbeforemediationtheproblemsexistinginrealityandreform,thispaperdiscussesthebackgroundofdefenseinChinabeforethemediation’-Thefirstchapter,mainlyonthebasictheoryofmediationlawsuitbeforethepaperdiscussedtheconceptoflawsuitbeforemediation·definitionandnatureisanalyzed,andtheformermediationandsomesimilarlawsuitconfusinglyconceptswereanalyzed,,fromChina’Straditionalmediationofproblemsandlawsuitbeforemediationitselfhasthesuperiorityanalysis,discussesestablishedbeforethenecessityoflawsuitsystemofmediation,binationwithlawsuitmediationinourcoumryhasbeforetheprofoundhistoricalorigin,aswellasChina’Smultiplexdisputesettlementmechanismstatusofdevelopmentandcurrentlegislationofle
我国诉前调解制度的研究 来自淘豆网m.daumloan.com转载请标明出处.
