:..anizationWT/DS58/AB/R12October1998(98-3899)Original: EnglishUNITEDSTATES-IMPORTPROHIBITIONOFCERTAINSHRIMPANDSHRIMPPRODUCTSAB-1998-4ReportoftheAppellateBodyWT/DS58/AB/RPageI. Introduction:StatementoftheAppeal 1II. ArgumentsoftheParticipantsandThirdParticipants 7A. ClaimsofErrorbytheUnitedStates–Appellant 71. Non-requestedInformationfromNon-anizations 72. ArticleXXoftheGATT1994 7B. India,PakistanandThailand–JointAppellees 131. Non-requestedInformationfromNon-anizations 132. ArticleXXoftheGATT1994 15C. Malaysia-Appellee 191. Non-requestedInformationfromNon-anizations 192. ArticleXXoftheGATT1994 20D. ArgumentsofThirdParticipants 211. Australia 212. Ecuador 243. munities 244. HongKong,China 275. Nigeria 28III. ProceduralMattersandRulings 29A. AdmissibilityoftheBriefsbyNon-anizationsAppendedtotheUnitedStatesAppellant'sSubmission 29B. SufficiencyoftheNoticeofAppeal 32IV. IssuesRaisedinThisAppeal 35V. PanelProceedingsandNon-requestedInformation 35VI. AppraisingSection609UnderArticleXXoftheGATT1994 40A. ThePanel'sFindingsandInterpretativeAnalysis 40B. ArticleXX(g):ProvisionalJustificationofSection 609 471. "ExhaustibleNaturalResources" 472. "RelatingtotheConservationof[ExhaustibleNaturalResources]" 533. "IfSuchMeasuresareMadeEffectiveinconjunctionwith RestrictionsonDomesticProductionorConsumption" 55C. TheIntroductoryClausesofArticle XX:CharacterizingSection 609undertheChapeau'sStandards 571. GeneralConsiderations 552. "UnjustifiableDiscrimination" 633. "ArbitraryDiscrimination" 72VII. FindingsandConclusions 76WT/DS58/AB/anizationAppellateBodyUnitedStates–ImportProhibitionofCertainShrimpandShrimpProductsUnitedStates, AppellantIndia,Malaysia,Pakistan,Thailand, AppelleesAustralia,Ecuador,munities,HongKong,China,MexicoandNigeria,ThirdParticipants AB-1998-4 Present: Feliciano,PresidingMember hus,Member Lacarte-Muró,:
龟虾案 wto裁决 来自淘豆网m.daumloan.com转载请标明出处.
