许霆案再的分析研究.pdf

f舢删舢舢洲删删脚ffff洲 Y2322773 第三部分是通过上文对许霆案的分析得出的启示。当民意与司法碰撞时该如何处理,提出了酌定减轻处罚制度的完善建议。最后,对法官的自由裁量权的适用提出了自己的观点。关键词:许霆案;盗窃罪;民意;自由裁量权;特殊减轻制度 Abstract Abstract Afew years ago,XU TING isthe ofspecimens under the rule oflaw significance and ishard for criminal cases,along with country economy high speed development,the progress ofthe society,ATM machines have e indispensable part ofpeople’S life,but also appear many social criminal law rules do not explicitly using the ATM machine fault malicious withdrawal behavior how toqualitative,can’t find pletely conform tothe rule this, legal department is inthe United States,sun zhigang incountry,has been promoting the advancement ofthe rule ting’S ishistorical must seize the opportunity,again and again tostudy and study again,makes every effort topromote China’S rule oflaw progress inargument. This paper content isdivided into three parts: The first part:this part first isbrief introduction ofthe case,the court’S verdict isintroduced atthe by the list of related experts and scholars and the public opinions and perceptions ofting section will focus the focus ofcontroversy,XH ting case,put forward respectively inbehavior qualitmive,conviction and sentencing inthree aspects. Part 2:the second part isthe focus ofthis the controversial focus ofthe first part put forward detailed analysis,thus draws myown first section focuses whether the act constitutes crime,through the”unjust enrichment”and ’bank fault said”retort,that behavior isharmful tothe society,the criminal law shall behavior constitutes what charges are discussed inthe second quarter,based the constitutes the crime ofencroachment retort that this behavior should constitute theft, conform ponents ofthe theft,but cannot constitute theft offinancial institutions. Finally,on the behavior ofthe 黑龙江大学硕士学位论文 sentencing plot are discussed,think to xu ting s