SCI英文论文审稿意见汇总[共6页].doc

英文论文审稿意见汇总
以下 12 点无 轻重主 次之分。每一点内 容由总 结性标题和代表性 审稿人 意见构成。
1 、目 标和结 果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with
expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English
grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the
study are clear to the reader.
2 、未 解释研 究方法或解 释不充 分。
◆ In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical me
thods used in the study.
◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various
experiments
should be provided.
3 、对 于研究 设计的 rationale:
Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.
4 、夸 张地陈 述结论 /夸 大成果/不严谨：
The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show
if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer
formulation.
5 、对 hypothesis 的清 晰界定 ：
A hypothesis needs to be presented 。
6 、对 某个概 念或工具使 用的 rationale/ 定 义概念 ：
What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?
7 、对 研究问 题的定义：
Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear,
write one section to define the problem
8 、如 何凸现 原创性以及 如何充 分地写 literature review:
The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.
9 、对 claim, 如 A＞ B 的证明 ，verification:
There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known
work, so it is impossible to judge whether the a