不同敷料预防及治疗ⅰ期压疮的效果比较.pdf

Abstract Y25891 90 objective pare whether differences feel transparent dressing and Biatain adhesive dressings inthepressure ulcerprevention andtreatment ofstageIpressure ulcers(PU).At thesametime,pare whether expenditure differences feel transparent dressing and Biatain adhesive dressings inthe PU prevention and treatment ofstage I seekmore convenient,effective andeconomic dressings for PU prevention andtreatment ofstage provides acertain basisforthe clinical application. Methods Aprospective randomized study was conducted on 67patients athigh riskofpressure ulcerwhich Wasdivided intotwo groups astransparent dressings and adhesive dressings. Observe thepatients’skin once every 24h,when the urePU,record thesametime,observe wether thepatients occure skinallergy when useing dressing, record the行equency ofchanging thedressing and withstage I PU onadmission urred during thehospitalization Was alsodivided intothetwo groups by thepatients’skin once every 24hand record each patient treatment es,including fine,improvement and patients occure skinallergy when useing dressing,record the丘equency ofchanging the dressing and datawas processed by SPSS software. Results The incidenceofpressure ulcers onthesacrum,was %(1/35)in thetransparent dressings group %(1/32)in the adhesive dressingsgroup(P ,P> ).there were no statistical forthetreatment ofstage IPU,1 7 patients inthetransparentdressings pete healing in cases(%), improvement in4cases(%)and inefficacy in 2cases(%).1 7patients inthe adhesive pete healing in 5cases(%),improvement in6 cases (%)and inefficacy in6cases(%),comparison ofthe differences:Z=—.,P=,P<,the difference Was 52patients application feel transparentdressing for PU prevention andtreatment ofPU have no skinallergy phenomenon;the 32p