中文版 Tilburg 衰弱评估量表的信效度研究.pdf

年月护理学报
2013 8 August,2013
第卷第期
20 8B Journal of Nursing(China)
研究生园地论著
【· 】
中文版衰弱评估量表的信效度研究
Tilburg
奚兴郭桂芳孙静
, ,
北京大学护理学院北京
( , 100191)
摘要目的对英文版衰弱评估量表进行汉化评价中文版的信效度方法采用翻译法对英文版
[ ] Tilburg , 。 Brislin
衰弱评估量表进行汉化将经过文化调试的量表应用于例老年慢性病患者中评估其信效度结果中文版衰
Tilburg ; 138 , 。 Tilburg
弱评估量表达到语义内容的对等性总量表的系数为各条目与总得分的相关系数衰
、; Cronbach’s α ; r=~,P<,Tilburg
弱评估量表总得分与简明健康测量量表总得分的相关系数并能有效区分不同自理能力的老年人
r=-,P<, (Z=,
结论衰弱评估量表具有可接受的信度和效度可作为老年慢性病患者衰弱的评估工具初步筛选出衰弱的高危
P<)。 Tilburg , ,
人群
。
关键词衰弱老年慢性病衰弱评估量表信度效度
[ ] ; ; ; Tilburg ; ;
中图分类号文献标识码文章编号
[ ] [ ] A [ ] 1008-9969(2013)08B-0001-05
Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Tilburg Frailty Indicator
XI Xing, GUO Gui-fang, SUN Jing
(School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China)
Abstract: Objective To translate the English version of Tilburg Frailty Indicator into Chinese and to assess the reliability and
validity of the Chinese version. Methods With Brislin’ translation model, the English version of Tilburg Frailty Indicator was
translated into Chinese and then its Chinese version was applied among 138 senior patients with chronic disease to assess its
reliability and validity. Results The Chinese version of the scale attained equivalence semantically and in content. Total Cronbach’s
α coefficient was and corre