程华珍 【摘 要】目的:研究不同的治疗方案用于治疗妇产科宫颈糜烂患者的临床疗效。方法:在我院妇产科室2016年6月至2018年10月期间收治的宫颈糜烂患者中,随机择取120例患者作为研究对象,根据治疗方式不同将其随机分为两组。研究组接受激光治疗和药物治疗联合方案,参照组则仅接受药物治疗,对比两组患者接受治疗后的疗效。结果:研究组患者阴道停止渗液的时间以及症状改善的时间均显著短于参照组患者,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<);研究组患者使用联合疗法后总的治疗有效率显著高于参照组患者,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<);研究组患者发生并发症几率与复发率均低于参照组患者,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<)。结论:妇产科室收治宫颈糜烂患者后,可优先采取激光疗法联合药物治疗的综合治疗方式,可显著提升患者的治疗有效率。 【关键词】联合治疗方式;激光治疗;药物治疗;治疗效果;并发症发生率 Abstract Objective: To study the clinical efficacy of different treatment regimens in the treatment of cervical erosion in obstetrics and gynecology. Methods: Among the patients with cervical erosion who were admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in our hospital from June 2016 to October 2018, 120 patients were randomly selected as subjects, and they were randomly divided into two groups according to different treatment methods. The study group received a combination of laser therapy and drug therapy, while the reference group received only drug therapy, comparing the efficacy of the two groups of patients after : The time to vaginal effusion and the time to symptom improvement were significantly shorter in the study group than in the reference group. The difference between the two groups