下载此文档

喀纳斯自然保护区森林植被碳储量分析word论文.docx


文档分类:行业资料 | 页数:约60页 举报非法文档有奖
1/60
下载提示
  • 1.该资料是网友上传的,本站提供全文预览,预览什么样,下载就什么样。
  • 2.下载该文档所得收入归上传者、原创者。
  • 3.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
1/60 下载此文档
文档列表 文档介绍
Abstract
Kanas National Nature Reserve located in the arid area, Xinjiang province, Northwest of China. The taiga forest in southern mountain area was important vegetation in the Kanas Reserve. The main forest type was Larix sibirica Ledeb., their main associated tree species were Picea obovata Ledeb., Abies sibirica Ledeb., Pinus sibirica (Loud.) Mayr., Betula pendula Roth., Populus tremula Linn., and so on. These forest vegetation had high scientific research value on the terrestrial ecosystem. If biomass and carbon storage of the forest vegetation could be assessed properly, it would be provide basic data for forest resource management, global carbon cycle research, and carbon sink evaluation. In this paper, the biomass and its distribution of different forest type were evaluated based on the measured data using the method of relative growth and full bined with the stands investigation data. Carbon storage and carbon density were calculated by biomass and their carbon content of different tree species. The characteristics of spatial distribution of carbon storage were explained based on the topographical map of forest management in the Kanas National Nature Reserve. The results show that:
The biomass distribution changed within an of P. obovata, L. sibirica, P. sibirica, and B. pendula. But the biomass of trunk was higher than the ans. The rank of biomass of an of P. obovata is trunk> roots> branches> bark > leaf, L. sibirica is trunk> roots> bark > branches > leaf, P. sibirica is trunk> branches > roots > bark > leaf, and B. pendula is trunk> roots> bark > branches > leaf. There were no significant difference between the biomass of branch and root of P. obovata, and P. sibirica (p>), and significant difference among the biomass of an of L. sibirica, and B. pendula(p<).
There were correlationship between DBH or D2 and biomass of individual tree, and their relationship showed by power function model. The functions of 4 main forest
type were as follows:

喀纳斯自然保护区森林植被碳储量分析word论文 来自淘豆网m.daumloan.com转载请标明出处.

相关文档 更多>>
非法内容举报中心
文档信息
  • 页数60
  • 收藏数0 收藏
  • 顶次数0
  • 上传人wz_198613
  • 文件大小1.78 MB
  • 时间2018-02-24