回复英文论文编辑部的修改意见.docx

回复英文论文编辑部的修改意见Response to Editor and Reviewer
……….., . Professor
Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and
Ecological Environment Research,
Huazhong Agricultural University,
Wuhan, 430070,
E-mail: .....................
 
Jun 10, 2009
 
 
RE:  HAZMAT-D-09-00655
Dear Editor,
 
We would like to thank the editor for giving us a chance to resubmit the paper, and also thank the reviewers for giving us constructive suggestions which would help us both in English and in depth to improve the quality of the paper. Here we submit a new version of our manuscript with the title “………………………”, which has been modified according to the reviewers’ suggestions. Efforts were also made to correct the mistakes and improve the English of the manuscript. We mark all the changes in red in the revised manuscript.
 
Sincerely yours,
 
……………….., . Professor
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is a point-to-point response to the two reviewers’ comments.
 
Reviewer #1:
 
ments:
 
Reviewer #1: The paper presents an interesting experimental investigation to assess the photocatalytic degradation of polyethylene plastic with goethite under UV irradiation. The research work is clearly presented but the conclusions, the introduction and other parts of the paper relate the results obtained with unjustified claims about the impact of the work. In addition, the background information provided in the introduction part needs significant enrichment. In particular:
Answer: Thank you for ments on the paper. We have revised the manuscript as suggested since we consider that some sentences or descriptions in the Conclusion part are not so accurate based on the results. 
 
 
Page 3, line 46: recycling is not available…
Even though a large amount of agricultural plastic waste in burnt or buried in the fields, some quantities of specific categories of good quality agricultural plastic