无痛人流与传统人流临床疗效比较陈晓红(湖北省阳新县人民医院妇产科湖北阳新435200)【摘要】目的比较无痛人流手术和传统人流手术终止早孕的临床疗效,为合理选择人工流产方式提供依据。方法将633例要求终止早孕患者,根据木人自主选择分为无痛人流(A组)326例,传统人流(B组)307例。比较两组患者疼痛程度、宫颈松弛情况、手术时间、人工流产综合症、术中出血量、宫腔粘连、盆腔感染、阴道流血时间、月经复潮时间的差异。结果无痛人流组在疼痛程度、宫颈松弛情况、手术时间、人工流产综合症等方面显著优于传统手术组,差异有统计学意义(P<);在术中出血量、宫腔粘连、盆腔感染、阴道流血时间及月经复潮时间方面二者之间比较差异无统计学意义(P>)o结论无痛人流术能够减轻患者疼痛,提高宫颈松弛度进而缩短手术时间,降低人工流产综合症等并发症的发生,较传统人流更为广大妇女所接受。【关键词】无痛人流传统人流临床疗效【中图分类号】 【文献标识码】B【文章编号】2095-1752(2012)16-0299-paringtheclinicalcurativeeffectofpainlessinducedabortionandtraditionalabortionChenxiao-hong(Departmentofgynecologyandobstetrics,RenMinHospitalofYangxincountory,Hubeiprovince,435200)【Abstract】paringtheclinicalcurativeeffectaboutpainlessinducedabortionandtraditionalabortion,:Accordingtopatientswithvoluntarychoice,(A)group326cases,traditionalabortion(B)paretwosetsofpatientswithpain,cervicalflabbycondition,operationtime,abortionsyndrome,peri-operativebleeding,uterinecavityadhesion,pelvicinfection,:Painlessinducedabortion(A)groupinthedegreeofpain,Cervicalflabbycondition,operationtime,abortionsyndromeandeffectiveadhesionweresignificantlybetterthantraditionalabortion(B)-operativebleeding,uterinecavityadhesion,pelvicinfe
无痛人流与传统人流临床疗效比较 来自淘豆网m.daumloan.com转载请标明出处.