故意杀人罪立法完善.pdf

The legislation improvement
of offence of intentional killing


Candidate Wang Gang
Supervisor Vice. Professor Zhang Yonghong
College Law School
Program Law
Specialization Criminal Law
Degree Master of Law
University Xiang Tan University
Date Apr 28th, 2010
摘要
故意杀人罪作为常见、高发且死刑适用率极高的严重犯罪,对其进行研究具
有现实意义。现行故意杀人罪立法模式存在着罪状简单、刑罚粗疏等缺点,并体
现着重刑主义这一落后的刑法观念,不利于司法实践中正确地处理故意杀人犯
罪,从罪责刑相适应原则的贯彻和死刑控制的国际大环境出发,应当对故意杀人
罪进行立法上的完善。
立法完善从罪状与法定刑两方面出发。通过对构成要件要素的特殊性与一般
性的分析,使罪状从当前立法模式下的缺乏实质内容走向特定化、具体化、明确
化;在这一基础上,重新分割刑罚种类与刑罚幅度,使不同类别的罪状与不同种
类及幅度的法定刑相匹配。
结合学界既有观点,并世界各法治先进国家、地区立法经验及我国古代法制
传统,现行刑法中故意杀人罪的立法完善可以三种模式展开,即增设罪名的方案、
量化情节的方案以及复合型方案。三方案立足点不同,但最终之目的都在于实现
立法完善的初衷,即刑事责任的科学分配、刑罚轻缓和死刑限制。增设罪名的方
案,立足于分解现存故意杀人罪一罪为数罪,使故意杀人罪从个罪变更为类罪,
重新规定构成要件内容及刑罚内容,从而更加科学地划分刑事责任、有效控制死
刑适用;量化情节的方案,立足于将量刑情节具体化,采用明确列举方式,并增
列故意杀人罪的从严情节,使基本情节、加重情节、减轻情节并存,达到精确划
分刑事责任的目的,实现刑罚科学,既而有效控制死刑;复合型方案博采二者之
所长,在罪名与情节的双重完善下,实现立法完善之目的。

关键词:故意杀人罪;立法完善;罪状;法定刑;刑事责任
Abstract
Offence of intentional killing is the serious crimes mon, high-fat and
high rate of death penalty , the research into the cause is necessary. The existing
legislation of offence of intentional killing have ings, and reflect the heavy
penalty doctrine, it is not conducive to the judicial practice. Therefore, the
improvement of legislation of offence of intentional killing is very necessary.
The improvement of legislation shoud consider the facts about a crime and the
punishment. Analysising the specificity and generality of constitution of crime, and
make the facts about a crime e specialization, materialization and reflexivity.
And there's the foundation of the improvement of the punishment.
Considering the existing academic point of view, advanced experience of other
countries and Chinese ancient tradition, the author believe that there are three ways to
improve the legislation of offence of intentional killing: the way to increase the
charges, the way to quantize Circumstances and pound