伪证罪分析研究.pdf

摘要摘要伪证罪是一种古老的犯罪,关涉实体,程序法律,历来为各国所重视。本文从分析伪证罪的构成要件入手,指出当前伪证罪在立法层面究竟存在哪些争议点, 在此基础上提出了一些建议,并据此得出伪证罪应从哪些方面进行完善。本文的结构如下:第一部分:引言。引言概述了我国理论界关于伪证罪的研究现状, 包括研究热点和焦点问题。伪证罪主体是争议最多的部分,也是本文研究的重点所在。第二部分:伪证罪的构成特征分析。从传统的四要件出发,有重点地剖析了此罪的构成要件。只有准确掌握了四要件,才能正确认定伪证罪而不偏差。第三部分:伪证罪的认定。阐明了伪证罪的停止形态,共同犯罪形态,罪数形态以及与相似罪名的区分。如与包庇罪、诬告陷害罪、妨害作证罪的区分。划清相似罪名的界限,对司法实践颇有指导意义。第四部分:伪证罪的立法局限及完善。伪证罪可发生在民事、行政诉讼中。记录人不应作为伪证罪的主体。犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的近亲属包庇他们而作伪证可以从轻、减轻或免除处罚。第五部分:结论与展望。通过本文的分析与阐述,得出本文的结论。并指出本文的不足之处与下一步研究的方向。关键词:伪证罪;构成特征;完善建议 Abstract ABSTRACT The Crime ofFalseWitness is acrimewith alonghistory,related tosubstantive and procedural law,and seriously taken by every state plied with analyzing thiscrime’s constitutionalcharacteristicsstarting,pointing outthiscrime oncurrently which dispute tothere existinlegislation of facewhat thisbasis,Ihavebrought forward some view. Accordingly reachFalseWitness shouldwhich aspca tobeinprogress fromperf鳅. Thisarticle’SslnK:tl雌asfollows:The firstchapter: foreword has summarized 0111"country theory boundary's theproblem studying current situation, including thehotspotand focalpointstudying aboutcrimeoffalsifying evidence. The clime offalsifying evidence main body is thatdispute isthemost pri嘶ty location being alsothemain body of a book second chapter:Crime offalsifying evidence’Scompose off fromfourimportantcondition oftradition,have thepriority field tohaveanalyzed thiscrime'scomposingimportant grasped fourimportant condition only rightness setsmind oncrimeoffalsifying evidence but 110 :The crimeoffalsifying evidence crimeoffalsifying evidence stoppage form,joint offenseform,cTime number form andthedifferentiationwitllsimilarity theblame on ifgiving evidencewithcoveringupcrime,crime usation,being harmful boundary distinguishingsimilarity accusation,has guiding