刑事强制措施的分析研究.pdf

刑事强制措施研究中文摘要刑事强制措施是一项非常重要的刑事诉讼制度,它既是关系到整个刑事诉讼活动能否顺利进行,以求发现真实,确定具体刑罚,以维护社会安全和公共利益;又是关系到对人权保障状况的影响,因为其运用足以侵害到个体的人身自由和其它一些利益。考察英美法系和大陆法系有关国家关于刑事强制措施的做法,我们不难发现它们存在着:司法审查制度、强制措施种类较单一、保释率高等特点。我国的做法与之迥然不同。本文通过阐述我国刑事强制措施与人权保障的关系,与程序公正的关系等理论基础和实际运用的状况,指出目前在运用强制措施方面均存在一定的问题。如:对于拘传的12小时限制所作的“规避”(留置制度的运用;“两规”措施的运用);逮捕率高居不下??指出了原因在于:立法和司法解释的冲突;传统重实体轻程序的观念;办案人员执法理念等等。当然,我们在看到问题的同时,也在积极改进和提高。本文结合国外先进做法和我国的实际情况,特别是结合具体实务操作,提出一些切实可行的办法: 积极推行类似与国外的司法审查制度(由于这存在法律修改和制度完善等原因, 当务之急是提高逮捕的质量),完善取保候审方式(如:公、检、法三机关对于取保候审时间的统一问题)等。希望通过论述对我国的司法实践有所帮助。关键词刑事诉讼强制措施人权保障程序公正 2 刑事强制措施研究 Abstract Criminal coercive measure is one of the most important institution in criminal can influence not only tile essful implement of the whole criminal procedure,but also tileprotection ofhuman purpose ofcriminaI coercive measure iS to find the truth,to determine the concrete penalty and tomaintain the public safety and interests,because the implement of criminal coercive ine'.1sure would trespass on the person-ll freedom and soIne other jUterests. parison with the practice of criminal coercive measure in related countries where Anglo—American law and continental legal law arc executedt itis not dif竹cult to find that there are sonic conlmun asjudicial review iustitution,coercive lneasure sinq)lcx category,as well as high odds of bailment, practice ill our country isquite different from ones’in those problems in practice of crhuinal coercive ineasure in OUl‘ country”iere pointed out in this paper by enucleating the theoretical pt”inciple and practical situations ofrelationshil)aulong criminal coercive nleasure,thp protection ofhuulan rights anti impal‘tial example:the av')idangc ol。12 hours of detention lbr questioning(the inlplement institution and execution of“two ordains”),high odds ofarrest, reasons caused the situation mentioned above vcere conflict between legislation and judicial inter‘pretation,traditional c