两种方法治疗小儿支气管肺炎临床观察.docx

两种方法治疗小儿支气管肺炎临床观察
[摘要] 目的：比较序贯疗法和常规静脉滴注法治疗支气管肺炎的临床疗效。方法：将70例小儿支气管肺炎随机分为序贯疗法组36例和静脉滴注法组34例，观察两组疗效。结果：%(25/36)，%(7/36)，%(4/36)，无效0例，%(32/36)。静脉滴注组：%(25/34)，%(6/34)，%(3/34)，无效0例，%。两组在治疗效果、总有效率上无显著性差异(t=，P>)；序贯疗法组住院时间(±) d与静脉滴注组(±) d比较有显著性差异(t=，)。结论：序贯治疗能节省治疗费用、降低院内交叉感染、减轻患儿痛苦。
[关键词] 序贯治疗；支气管肺炎；小儿
[中图分类号] +2 [文献标识码]A [文章编号]1673-7210（2008）07（c）-047-02
Clinical observation in Children with bronchopneumonia by two methods
DENG Jin-xing
(Department of Pediatrics Lianping People's Hospital，Lianping 517100，China)
[Abstract] Objective:To compare sequential therapy and conventional intravenous infusion treatment of the clinical effect of bronchopneumonia. Methods:70 cases of bronchopneumonia in children were randomly divided into sequential therapy group(n=36)and intravenous infusion group(n=34)，the effects were observed. Results: The sequential therapy group recovery %(25/36)，effective %(7/36)，improvement %(4/36)，invalid 0，and the total efficiency rate is % (32/36). Intravenous infusion group:% recovery(25/34)，effective % (6/34)，improvement %(3/34)，invalid 0，and the total efficiency rate is %.and there is no significant difference (t=，P>) in the total efficiency and overall treatment time between the t