雅思写作.doc

2014 年2月 22 日雅思大作文范文——来自环球雅思张嵩老师 Educating children is expensive and the government of some countries pays some of or all of the costs. Do the advantages of the government paying for the costs outweigh the disadvantages? (Word count=287) Financial coverage bythe government, complete orpartial, onchildren education strikes readers asasound argument :under-privileged families are helped, education isgenerally promoted, and better prospects ofthe country are likely ensured. However, this essay seeks dialectical rationale .Asadirect consequence ofeducating children atthe government ’sexpense, tax will beraised. Considering that acountry has limited financial resources for any given period, money will have toberaised, and taxation will bethe sharpest tool inthe box .With higher taxes imposed, the public will likely hold agrudge against the government despite governmental investment inchildren education, which isdirectly inconflict with immediate forts . Moreover, financial support from the government discourages education in general and hence children education. With governmental funding guaranteed, education facilities and educator alike would lose their incentives ofbettering education and attracting students. Moreover, with the void ofefficient fund management policies and enforcement, educating bodies would fight over easy money, and corruption might beimminent . Finally yet importantly, waste ofresources might happen. When (semi-)free education iswithin reach ,the public might give atry toall extra-curriculum activities and other training courses that might ornot remotely help their children. Regular school syllabi might be conveniently overlooked and wasted. Even ifregular schooling ispaid attention to, reckless education decisions/choices made for children might not beout ofinterest ortalents ofthe learners. However, the situation can bereversed ifacountry isaffluent enough, investment management policies are inplace ,and ifthe public take education opportunities