TPO托福综合写作.doc

In the lecture, the professor states that salvage logging is harmful toa damaged forest and to the economy which casts doubt on the main idea of the reading passage that salvage logging is beneficial to a damaged forest and economy. TO begin with, the professor arg ues that removing the dead trees does not create the right condition for fresh growth which refutes the viewpoint presented in the article that salvage logging makes room for fresh growth immediately. According to the professor, without the dead trees, the soil may does not have the nutrition for the growth of new trees. This directly contradict s what the reading passage indicates. Furthermore, the author claims that salvage logging helps minimize the dangers of insect infestation and makes contribution to the death of the forest ,whereas the professor does not agree with it. In accordance with the professor, the dead trees can be used by birds and other helpful insects which make contribution to the growth of the forest. This is another place where the professor dis agree s with the writer. Finally contrary to the beli ef in the passage that salvage logging has economic benefits and create additi o nal jobs for local people, the professor asserts that the benefit is small and not lasting long. In order to demonstrate his perspective, he provides us with the evidence that the jobs created are temperate and the workers need more training because they work outside. TPO3 in the lecture, the professor states that the painting ofa woman in indeed isa work of Rembrandt which casts doubts on the main idea of the passage that there are problems with the painting suggests that the paint could be not created by Rembrandt . To begin with, the professor argues that the collar is not original of the painting because it is on the top of the painting. It is highly possible that people want to increase the value of the painting so they add the luxurious collar. This repudiates the viewpoint presented in the article that