七宗罪.docx

[原创]AA七宗罪的记忆方法:因、果、证
分析了两个晚上的AA,发现“七宗罪”确实是好东西,就是那些“罪”太多、而且过于零散,很难记忆。因此将七宗罪分类整理了一下,按照论证的原因、结果、论证过程三部分,归为三个类别:
因、果、证
1、因
就是原因上的问题,有以下三个:
可疑调查
样本不足
结论无据
2、果
就是结论上的问题,有以下两个:
无因果联系
二者择一
3、证
就是论证过程上的问题,有以下两个,纵向横向各一个:
错误类比(横向)
时地全等(纵向)
这样,只要记住了三字诀:因、果、证,就很容易记牢全部七宗罪了。
顺便分析一下本月JJ的一篇AA:
“Our total sales have increased this year by 20 percent since we added a pharmacy section to our
grocery store. Clearly, the customer’s main concern is the convenience afforded by one-stop
shopping. // 无因果联系,可能另有他因。 The surest way to increase our profits over
the next couple
of years, therefore, is to add a clothing department along with an automotive supplies and repair
shop. We should also plan to continue adding new departments and services, such as a restaurant
and a garden shop, in subsequent years. // 时地全等 Being the only store in the area that offers such a range of services will give us petitive advantage over other local stores.”// 结论无据
附:七宗罪
第一宗罪:无因果联系
The mits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. (The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality. However, the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.) But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been consi