幼儿园安全日排查台账.doc

The world needs bankers adventure
Mainstream view is that the financial crisis originated in the . proved that the "Anglo - Saxon" financial model too dangerous, there is a serious flaw, there is nothing worth learning elsewhere in the world. After all, if this model has merit, the United States and the United Kingdom's banking system nearly crashing why would collapse?
But the Anglo - Saxon financial model in the 1990s, the reason why prestige high, at least to some extent due to long advocated the "other" major banking model seems to countries suffered a defeat.
In the 1980s, Japanese banks put money spawned the largest ever one stock and real estate bubbles. They are bad investments reckless behavior perhaps only in recent years China's massive spending to par (Incidentally, the Chinese and Japanese banks have a lot of similarities).
So, if all of the financial system are bound to fail? 20th century's most prominent (probably underestimated) One economist Hyman Minsky ? (Hyman Minsky) pointed out, it is impossible to design foolproof, never happen crisis financial system. After all, the bank depositors and borrowers roles act as intermediaries between savers most attention is stable, while holding credit borrowers often want to take risks. History shows that Minsky was right. Without a growing economy can maintain a stable financial system. In fact, often those most willing to support the financial system adventurous entrepreneurs in society, the long-term accumulation of wealth created before the most. And that a financial system is more willing to high-risk new business financing, banking instability likely.
Or, which is why making the subprime crisis of the financial system for puter and revolution has provided historian Raymond ? Deluo Fu (Raymond de Roover) has pointed out that in the 19th century, the "reckless banking bring serious loss to creditors on the one hand, on the other hand the . economy accelerated development an