驰名商标论文：论我国的驰名商标的司法认定.doc

驰名商标论文:论我国驰名商标的司法认定
【中文摘要】本文运用历史分析法、实证分析法和归纳法对我国驰名商标司法认定进行研究,除了引言和结论外,正文为四部分。第一部分对驰名商标的概念和认定模式进行概述,同时对我国驰名商标司法认定制度发展进行梳理和解析。第二部分结合司法实践中案例和最新的司法解释来探讨我国驰名商标司法认定的被动认定,按需认定和个案有效三原则,适用范围和认定标准。第三部分指出我国驰名商标司法认定过程中存在的问题,这些问题主要是各地法院认定驰名商标所考虑因素不统一;驰名商标司法认定出现虚假诉讼;驰名商标司法认定易受地方保护主义干扰;司法认定与行政认定冲突。针对上述问题分析归纳了问题产生的原因,这些原因主要是司法认定制度法律体系不够完善,企业把“司法认驰”作为一种营销手段,某些地方政府角色错位,社会公众迷信于驰名商标,司法认定的监督机制不够完善。第四部分对于我国驰名商标司法认定制度完善的进行一些探讨,主要包括明确认定标准,引入反淡化制度;通过司法解释来制定专门的驰名商标的民事诉讼诉讼程序;司法认定引入专家制度;建立事前和事中司法认定的法律监督制度;规范驰名商标的实用、宣传工作;规范地方政府行为;建立司法认定和行政认定的协调机制。
【英文摘要】In this paper, historical analysis, empirical analysis and induction judicial determination of well-known trademarks in China to study, in addition to the introduction and conclusion, the body into four parts. The first part of the conc
ept of well-known trademark and finds an overview of patterns, while judicial determination of well-known trademarks in China to sort out and resolve system development. The second part of the judicial practice in cases and judicial interpretation of the latest well-known trademarks of the passive judicial determination finds that the effective demand and case identified three principles, scope, and that standard. The third part of that process of judicial determination of well-known trademark problems, these problems are mainly well-known trademark all over the court finds that the consideration is not unified; well-know