适用语言学与应用语言学.ppt

Appliable Linguistics and Applied Linguistics适用语言学与应用语言学
Huang Guowen (黄国文)
Sun Yat-sen University
<******@.>
Main Points
1 Halliday vs Widdowson
2 The definition of AL
3 Widdowson’s distinction between AL & LA
4 Halliday’s SFL & appliable linguistics
5 Widdowson’s criticism
6 Widdowson’s motivation of distinguishing AL from LA
7 Discussion
1 Halliday vs Widdowson
Halliday: Systemic Functional Linguistics, Appliable Linguistics
Widdowson: Applied linguistics, Linguistics applied
Halliday: Systemic Functional Linguistics, Appliable Linguistics
系统功能语言学Systemic Functional Linguistics
适用语言学 Appliable Linguistics
Halliday, ., An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Arnold, 1985, 1994.
Halliday, ., Working with meaning: Towards an appliable linguistics. In Webster (ed) Meaning in Context, Continuum,2008, 7-23.
Halliday, ., McIntosh, A. & Strevens, P., The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: Longman, 1964.
Widdowson: Applied linguistics, Linguistics applied
“应用语言学”(Applied Linguistics, AL)
“语言学的应用”(Linguistics Applied, LA)
Widdowson, . 1980. “Models and fictions.” Applied Linguistics. 1/2: 165-70. (also in Widdowson, 1984. Explorations in Applied linguistics 2. OUP,21-27)
Widdowson, . 2000. “On the limitation of linguistics applied.” Applied Linguistics. 21/1: 3-25.
2 Definition of AL
Corder (1973: 10) The application of linguistic knowledge to some object – or applied linguistics, as its name implied – is an activity. It is not a theoretical study. It makes use of the findings of theoretical studies. The applied linguist is a consumer, or user, not a producer, of theories. If we use the term “theory” as it is used in science, then there is no such thing as a “theory of language teaching” or a “theory of speech therapy” or a “theory of literary criticism”. Language teaching is also an activity, but teaching languages is not the same activity as applied linguistics.
R. Kaplan & . Widdowson
Applied Linguistics