适用语言学与应用语言学.ppt

Appliable Linguistics and Applied Linguistics 适用语言学与应用语言学> Main Points ? 1 Halliday vs Widdowson ? 2 The definition of AL ? 3 Widdowson ’ s distinction between AL & LA ? 4 Halliday ’ s SFL & appliable linguistics ? 5 Widdowson ’ s criticism ? 6 Widdowson ’ s motivation of distinguishing AL from LA ? 7 Discussion 1 Halliday vs Widdowson ? Halliday: Systemic Functional Linguistics, Appliable Linguistics ? Widdowson: Applied linguistics, Linguistics applied Halliday: Systemic Functional Linguistics, Appliable Linguistics ?系统功能语言学 Systemic Functional Linguistics ?适用语言学 Appliable Linguistics ? Halliday, ., An Introduction to Functional Grammar . Arnold, 1985, 1994. ? Halliday, ., Working with meaning: Towards an appliable linguistics. In Webster (ed) Meaning in Context , Continuum,2008, 7-23. ? Halliday, ., McIntosh, A. & Strevens, P., The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching . London: Longman, 1964. Widdowson: Applied linguistics, Linguistics applied ?“应用语言学”( Applied Linguistics, AL ) ?“语言学的应用”( Linguistics Applied, LA ) ? Widdowson, . 1980. “ Models and fictions. ” Applied Linguistics . 1/2: 165-70. (also in Widdowson, 1984. Explorations in Applied linguistics 2 . OUP,21-27) ? Widdowson, . 2000. “ On the limitation of linguistics applied. ” Applied Linguistics . 21/1: 3-25. 2 Definition of AL ? Corder (1973: 10) The application of linguistic knowledge to some object – or applied linguistics, as its name implied – is an activity . It is not a theoretical study. It makes use of the findings of theoretical studies. The applied linguist is a consumer, or user, not a producer, of theories. If we use the term “ theory ” as it is used in science, then there is no such thing as a “ theory of language teaching ” or a “ theory of speech therapy ” or a “ theory of literary criticism ”. Language teaching is also an activity, but teaching languages is not the same activity as applied linguistics . R. Kaplan &