meetingbeforethetribunaladvocacy,righttocounselrule,separateidentifyingrule,。Asfortheevidencecapability,thisthesisdevelopsitfromitscharacteristicsofobjectivity,relevancy,andlegitimacy,pointingoutthattheidentificationconclusionshouldhaveevidencequalification,alsoabouttheexclusionoftheillegalidentificationconclusion,,thisthesisdevelopsfromtheidentificationconclusion’screditability,relevancydegree,fromtheidentificationsubject,identificationobject,theidentificationcourse,andtheircolligationwiththeotherevidencesnarratesthestandardsofcheckinguptheidentificationconclusioncreditability,andherewith,,thisthesisexpoundsthecarrieroftheidentificationsconclusion——theidentificationnotes’facture,Ⅳ:thedisfigurementandperfectionsoftheidentificationinstitutioninourcountry,,thedisfigurementsarerevealedinthelegislationandthepractice,includingthechaosinthelegalpracticeandtheillegibilityoftheexaminingandapprovingbodies,theconflictsoftherelatedregulations,theseriousdefectionoftherightspreservedforthesuspectedandthelackoftheclausesorregulations。Thenitbringsoutthesuggestionstoperfecttheinstitutionfromtheaspectsoflegislation,thesystemoftheidentificationsrules,:identification,ruleofidentification,identificationconclusion,petence目 录第一部分绪论·······························································1一、刑事辨认概念····························································1二、刑事辨认的属性和分类················································2(一)刑事辨认的属性······················································2(二)刑事辨认的分类······················································3三、刑事辨认程序的主体和客体··········
论刑事辨认制度-刑事诉讼法专业毕业论文 来自淘豆网m.daumloan.com转载请标明出处.
