程序正义与实体正义之争.doc

程序正义与实体正义之争.doc程序正义与实体正义之争OnproceduraljusticeandsubstantivejusticeinlawOnsubstantivejusticeandproceduraljustice・ItisofcoursereferredtothecaseofSimpson,Essienvictory,inadditiontosuperlawyers,itwascalleddreamteamdefendedwhatinnocenee,,thenistheresultlikelytobesooptimistic?Oh,youcanseeSheXianglincase,?Wedarenotsaythattheprocedureisfair,wemustbeabletoachievejudicialjustice,butinacertainsense,proceduraljusticewillgivejudicialjusticeandpavethewaytofairnessandjustice・[size二+0]incriminalproceedingsreferstotheidentificationofthejudiciaryonthedefendant,scriminalresporisibilityshouldbeconsistentwiththeobjectivefacts,,accordingtothematerialisticepistemologicalpointofview,theworldisknown,thingscanbeknown,sothefactthroughtheevidencecollectionandotheractivitieswillbeabletoidentifythecase,thecaseoftheobjectivetruth・Inourcountry,foralongtime,thedominantpositionisobjectivetruth・ItisrootedinthetraditionallegalcultureandideasoffeudalsocietyinChinaforthousandsofyears・EmphasizingtheresultandreducingtheformisagreatcharacteristicofChineselaw・AsWebbsaid,〃theChineseseekpracticaljusticeratherthanformallaw.〃“.[size二+0][1_Theso-calledreallawreferstothepublicprosecutor,authoritiesintheproofprocess,plywithrelevantprovisionsofthesubstantivelawandprocedurallaw,shallreachfromtheangleoflawcanberegardedasthedegreeofauthenticity・Buttheevidenceitselfcontingency,variablefactors,subjectivefactors,sothatwehavelostthebasicfactsofobjectivity,newfactsoftheproceedingsandforthefactthatthecourtisremodelingaftertheevidencelaw,procedurallawandsubstantivelaw,theadjusted,becausethisnewfactinevitablyinfiltrationofpeople,ssubjectivewill,istheonlysignificantlitigationfacts,soonly[size=+0][size=+0]belongstothe,zlegaltruth"・Moreover,asfarasmater