两种方法治疗小儿支气管肺炎临床观察.doc

两种方法治疗小儿支气管肺炎临床观察.doc两种方法治疗小儿支气管肺炎临床观察[摘要]目的:比较序贯疗法和常规静脉滴注法治疗支气管肺炎的临床疗效。方法:,观察两组疗效。结果:%(25/36),%(7/36),%(4/36),无效0例,总有效率8&9%(32/36)。静脉滴注组:%(25/34),%(6/34),%(3/34),无效0例,%o两组在治疗效果、总有效率上无显著性差异(t=,P>);序贯疗法纟fl住院时间(±)d与静脉滴注组(±)d比较有显著性差异(,P<)o序贯疗法组总疗程(±)d与静脉滴注组(±)d比较无显著性差异(",P>)o结论:序贯治疗能节省治疗费用、降低院内交叉感染、减轻患儿痛苦。[关键词]序贯治疗;支气管肺炎;小儿[屮图分类号]+2[文献标识码]A[文章编号11673-7210(2008)07(c)-047-02ClinicalobservationinChildrenwithbronchopnoumoniabytwomethodsDENGJin-xing(DepartmentofPediatricsLianpingPeople5sHospital,Lianping517100,China)[Abstract]Objective::70casesofbronchopneumoniainchildrenwereTandomlydividedintosequentialtherapygroup(rp:36)ondintravenousinfusiongroup(n=34),:%(25/36),%(7/36),%(4/36),invalid0,%(32/36).Intravenousinfusiongroup:%recovery(25/34),%(6/34),%(3/34),invalid0,%.andthereisnosignificantdifference(,P>)inthetotalefficiencyandoveralltreatmenttimebetweenthetwogroup,:Thesequentialth