摘要在国际贸易和运输越发便利、高效的今天,贸易摩擦也越来越多。本文通过阅读、翻译“巴拿马诉哥伦比亚指导性价格与入境港口限制措施案(WT/DS366)”, 整理出争议焦点以及专家组针对争议焦点进行的分析和推理过程,最终归纳出结论。本文目的在于整理出巴拿马和哥伦比亚争端的始末,WTO争端解决机制的运作程序,双方争议焦点,各方诉辩主张,专家组的分析结论及理由同时发掘专家组对案件评析中的关键点。巴拿马诉哥伦比亚案在几个方面解释了从前专家组没有涉及的规则空白,即专家小组第一次对《海关估价协定》、GATTl994第五条规定的“过境自由”给予解释和澄清,这给今后的案件提供了极富价值的参考意义。在提出新问题的同时,将其与我国的对外贸易现状相联系,分析我国在入世之后对海关法律法规的修改和执行情况、产生的问题并提出完善建议,同时提出笔者对我国建立良好国际应诉机制的殷切期盼。关键词:巴拿马与哥伦比亚争端,指导性价格,入境港口限制,海关估价协定 Abstract business andtransit e more andmore facilitatedand efficient;however,it brings more and more frictionbetween reading andtranslating“Panama -Indicative Pricesand Restrictions on Ports OfEntry(WT/D$366)”,this thesistries tOsort out theissuesofdisputes and panel’S analysis and reasoning process ofthese issues,and finally generalizes its aim ofthisthesisis anize thewhole story ofdispute between Panama andColombia,the operating mechanism ofDispute SettlementBody inⅥ呵O, theissues ofdisputes,parties’claims andarguments,the conclusionsand reasons of panel reportand atthesametimeexplore ease inseveral aspects explains some blanks of rules which panels before have never involved in,that panel in this case hasgiven explanation toCustoms Valuation Agreement,and “Freedom ofTransit”provided inGATT Canprovide avery valuable reference to cases new thesiswillconnect wim current situation ofinternationaltrade,and analyze thesituation ofverification and enforcement incustom lawandregulation afterentering WT0,theproblems e intobeing and raisesuggestions thesiswillput forwardan expectation forbuilding excellent intemationalappeal mechanism inChina. Keywords:Dispute betweenPanama andColombia,Indicative Prices,Restrictions on PortsofEntry,Customs Valuation Agreement 第1章引言 ,十年间WTO法律法规不断完善, 并引导着成员国相应健全自身法律和政策。尽管如此,摩擦和冲突仍无可避免, 当冲突各方将争议提交到WTO后,WTO争端解决机制开始发挥作用。通过研究 WTO争端实例,我们可以清楚地理解争端解决机构的运转程序、专家小组分析问题的思维方式,同
巴拿马诉哥伦比亚贸易争端案的分析与启示 来自淘豆网m.daumloan.com转载请标明出处.