2025年上半年教师资格考试高中《英语学科知识及教学能力》真题及答案.doc

该【2025年上半年教师资格考试高中《英语学科知识及教学能力》真题及答案 】是由【书犹药也】上传分享，文档一共【13】页，该文档可以免费在线阅读，需要了解更多关于【2025年上半年教师资格考试高中《英语学科知识及教学能力》真题及答案 】的内容，可以使用淘豆网的站内搜索功能，选择自己适合的文档，以下文字是截取该文章内的部分文字，如需要获得完整电子版，请下载此文档到您的设备，方便您编辑和打印。上六个月中小学教师资格考试真题试卷
《英语学科知识与教学能力》（高级中学）
（满分150分）
—、单项选择题（本大题共30小题，每题2分，共60分）
在每题列出旳四个备选项中选择一种最佳答案。
1. Excellent novels are those which ____ national and cultural barriers.
A. transcend B. traverse
C. suppress D. surpass
2. As Alice believed him to be a man of integrity, she refused to consider the possibility that his statement was＿＿．
A. irrelevant B. facetious
C. fictitious D. illogical
3. The girls are afraid that being friendly to strangers could be misinterpreted by their＿＿neighbours.
A. ever-present B. ever-presented
C. ever-presenting D. ever-presently
4. His presentation will show you ____ can be used in other contexts.
A. that you have observed
B. that how you have observed
C. how that you have observed
D. how what you have observed
5. Many students start each term with an award check, but by the time books are bought, food is paid for, and a bit of social life ＿＿, it looks rather emaciated.
A. lives B. lived
C. was lived D. has lived
6. Which of the following is correct in its use of punctuation?
A. The teacher asked, “Who said, ‘Give me liberty or give me death’?”
B. The teacher asked, “Who said, ‘Give me liberty or give me death?’”
C. The teacher asked, “Who said ‘Give me liberty or give me death’”?
D. The teacher asked, “Who said ‘Give me liberty or give me death’?”
7. The pair of English phonemes _ differ in the place of articulation.
A. /ʃ/ and /ʒ/
B. /θ/ and /ð/
C. /d/ and /z/
D. /m/ and /n/
8. There are ＿ consonant clusters in the sentence “Brian, I appreciate beautiful scarf you brought me.”
A. two B. three
C. four D. five
9. When saying “It’s noisy outside” to get someone to close the window, the speaker intends to perform a(n) ＿.
A. direct speech act
B. locutionary act
C. indirect speech act
D. perlocutionary act
10. That a Japanese child adopted at birth by an American couple will grow up speaking English indicates ＿ of human language.
A. duality B. cultural transmission
C. arbitrariness D. cognitive creativity
11. Fluent and appropriate language use requires knowledge of ＿ and this suggests
that we should teach lexical chunks rather than single words.
A. denotation B. connotation
C. morphology D. collocation
12. “Underlining all the past form verbs in the dialogue” is a typical exercise focusing on ＿.
A. use
C. meaning D. function
13. Which of the following activities may be more appropriate to help students practice a new structure immediately after presentation in class?
A. Role play.
B. Group discussion.
C. Pattern drill.
D. Written homework.
14. When teaching students how to give appropriate responses to a congratulation or an apology, the teacher is probably teaching at ＿.
A. lexical level
B. sentence level
C. grammatical level
D. discourse level
15. Which of the following activities can help develop the skill of listening for gist?
A. Listen and find out where Jim lives.
B. Listen and decide on the best title for the passage.
C. Listen and underline the words the speaker stresses.
D. Listen to pairs of words and tell if they are the same.
16. When an EFL teacher asks his student “How do you know that the author liked the place since he did not tell us explicitly?”, he/she is helping students to reach ＿ comprehension.
A. literal
B. appreciative
C. inferential
D. evaluative
17. Which of the following types of questions are mostly used for checking literal comprehension of the text?
A. Display questions.
B. Rhetorical questions.
C. Evaluation questions.
D. Referential questions.
18. Which of the following is a typical feature of informal writing?
A. A well-organized structure is preferred.
B. Short and incomplete sentences are common.
C. Technical terms and definitions are required.
D. A wide range of vocabulary and structural patterns are used.
19. Peer-editing during class is an important step of the ＿ approach to teaching writing.
A. genre-based
B. content-based
C. process-oriented
D. product-oriented
20. Portfolios, daily reports and speech delivering are typical means of ＿.
A. norm-referenced test
B. criterion-referenced test
C. summative assessment
D. formative assessment
请阅读 Passage l,完毕第 21~25小题。
Passage l .
When the Viaduct de Millau opened in the south of France in , this tallest bridge in the world won worldwide accolades. German newspapers described how it “floated above the clouds” with “elegance and lightness” and “breathtaking” beauty. In France, papers praised the “immense” “concrete giant.” Was it mere coincidence that the Germans saw beauty where the French saw heft and power? Lera Borodisky thinks not.
In a series of clever experiments guided by pointed questions, Boroditsky is amassing evidence that, yes, language shapes thought. The effect is powerful enough, she says, that “the private mental lives of speakers of different languages may differ dramatically,” not only when they are thinking in order to speak, “but in all manner of cognitive tasks,” including basic sensory perception. “Even a small fluke of grammar”—the gender of nouns—“can have an effect on how people think about things in the world,” she says.
As in that bridge, in German, the noun for bridge, Brucke, is feminine. In French, pont is masculine. German speakers saw prototypically female features; French speakers, masculine ones.
Similarly, Germans describe keys (Schlussel) with words such as hard, heavy, jagged, and metal, while to Spaniards keys (llaves) are golden, intricate, little, and lovely. Guess which language construes key as masculine and which as feminine? Grammatical gender also shapes how we construe abstractions. In 85 percent of artistic depictions of death and victory, for instance, the idea is represented by a man if the noun is masculine and a woman if it is feminine, says Boroditsky. Germans tend to paint death as male, and Russians tend to paint it as female.
Language even shapes what we see. People have a better memory for colors if different shades have distinct names—not English’s light blue and dark blue, for instance, but Russian’s goluboy and sinly. Skeptics of the language-shapes-thought claim have argued that that’s a trivial finding, showing only that people remember what they saw in both a visual form and a verbal one, but not proving that they actually see the hues differently. In an ingenious experiment, however, Boroditsky and colleagues showed volunteers three color swatches and asked them which of the bottom two was the same as the top one. Native Russian speakers were faster than English speakers when the colors had distinct names, suggesting that having a name for something allows you to perceive it more sharply. Similarly, Korean uses one word for “in” when one object is in another snugly, and a different one when an object is in something loosely. Sure enough, Korean adults are better than English speakers at distinguishing tight fit from loose fit.
Science has only scratched the surface of how language affects thought. In Russian, verb forms indicate whether the action was completed or not—as in “she ate [and finished] the pizza.” In Turkish, verbs indicate whether the action was observed or merely rumored. Boroditsky would love to run an experiment testing whether native Russian speakers are better than others at noticing if an action is completed, and if Turks have a heightened sensitivity to fact versus hearsay. Similarly, while English says “she broke the bowl” even if it smashed accidentally, Spanish and Japanese describe the same event more like “the bowl broke itself.” “When we show people video of the same event,” says Boroditsky, “English speakers remember who was to blame even in an accident, but Spanish and Japanese speakers remember it less well than they do intentional actions.
It raises questions about whether language affects even something as basic as how we construct our ideas of causality.”
21. Which of the following is closest in meaning to the underlined word “accolades” in PARAGRAPH ONE?
A. Praises.
B. Awards.
C. Support.
D. Gratitude.
22. What can be inferred from PARAGRAPH TWO?
A. Language does not shape thoughts in any significant way.
B. The relationship between language and thought is an age-old issue.
C. The language we speak determines how we think and see the world.
D. Whether language shapes thought needs to be empirically supported.
23. What is the role of the underlined part “As in that bridge” in PARAGRAPH THREE?
A. Reflecting on topics that appeal to the author and readers.
B. Introducing new evidence to what has been confirmed before.
C. Identifying the kinds of questions supported by the experiments.
D. Claiming that speakers of different languages differ dramatically.
24. Which of the following has nothing to do with the relationship between language and thought?
A. People remember what they saw both visually and verbally.
B. Language helps to shape what and how we perceive the world.
C. Grammar has an effect on how people think about things around us.
D. Science has only scratched the surface of how language affects thought.
25. Which of the following best represents the author’s argument in the passage?
A. The gender of nouns affects how people think about things in the world. .
B. Germans and Frenchmen think differently about the Viaduct de Millau.
C. Language shapes our thoughts and affects our perception of the world.
D. There are different means of proving how language shapes our thoughts.
请阅读Passage 26~30小题。
Passage 2
When American-born actor Michael Pena was a year old, his parents were deported. They had illegally walked across the . border from Mexico and when they were caught by immigration authorities, they sent Pena and his brother to stay with relatives in the . “It was quite a bit of a gamble for my parents,” says Pena, “but they came back a year later.” Pena’s father, who had been a farmer in Mexico, got a job at a button factory in Chicago and, eventually, a green card. Pena stayed in Chicago until, at 19, he fled to Los Angeles to pursue his acting dreams.
This family history makes Pena’s latest role especially personal. In Cesar Chavez, Pena plays the labor leader as he struggles to organize immigrant California farm workers in the 1960s. To pressure growers to improve working conditions and wages, Chavez led a national boycott of table grapes that lasted from 1965 to 1970 and is recorded in the film. Chavez, like Pena, was the American-born son of Mexican farmers who immigrated to the . “He understands this duality, the feeling of being born in a place but having a very big idea of where your heritage comes from,” says the film director, Diego Luna. “This thing of having to go to school and learn in English and then go home to speak Spanish with your parents.”
As immigration policy is hotly debated on Capitol Hill this year, Luna and others who were involved with Cesar Chavez are hoping the movie will spark new support for reform and inspire American Latinos to get involved. “The message Chavez left was that change couldn’t happen without the masses being a part of their own change,” says Ferrera, a first generation Honduran American who plays the union leader’s wife Helen. Rosario Dawson, who co-founded the advocacy group Voto Latino, plays Chavez ally and labor leader Dolores Huerta.
Immigrant-rights issues in the . have evolved substantially in the years since Chavez founded the United Farm Workers (UFW). Undocumented workers now make up a far larger share of the agricultural workforce in California than they did in the 1960s, according to Miriam Pawel, author of The Crusades of Cesar Chavez, published the next month. Chavez was
vehemently against illegal immigration, believing it made strikes difficult to execute and weakened the union. He initiated a program in the mid-1970s to locate undocumented farm workers and report them to
immigration official