论公司法人人格否认制度在我国的的适用__--__徐工集团工程机械股份有限公司诉成都川交工贸有限责任公司等买卖合同纠纷案.pdf

论公司法人人格否认制度在我国的适用1内容摘要本文先介绍该案例的基本案情,归纳出案件的三个焦点:成都川交工程机械有限责任公司、四川瑞路建设工程有限公司和成都川交工贸有限责任公司三个公司是否人格混同;成都川交工程机械有限责任公司和四川瑞路建设工程有限公司是否应对成都川交工贸有限责任公司的债务承担连带责任;王永礼等个人是否应对成都川交工贸有限责任公司的债务承担连带责任。然后对这三个焦点进行分析,得出对案件的总结。公司法人人格否认制度的概述部分,结合制度理念和基本规定阐述。该制度的内涵是什么,在历史上有何发展,它的理论与现实意义在哪等问题都在这部分介绍。本文随后,介绍该制度在我国的现状。第一,是对公司法人人格否认制度的构成要件的研究。第二,是分析中国《公司法》相关的规定。最后是介绍公司资本不实、规避法律义务、人格混同三大类适用该制度的情形。着眼于我国,该制度的立法才初步形成,还存在着许多缺陷,还存在着缺乏相应的具体规定、概念模糊等缺陷,笔者通过对司法应用中暴露出来的最突出的问题的研究从立法和司法实践方面,讨论挖掘出我国该制度存在的问题。在最后,本文针对中国该制度在立法和司法实践两个方面存在的许多缺陷,提出了相关建议。建议仍然围绕着立法和司法,旨在体系化立法规范,规范化司法审判,使得该制度可以在我国的具体国情中逐步完善地运行。AbstractThis paper first introduces the basic facts of the case, sum up three cases focus: Chengdu Chuanjiao Construction Machinery Co., Ltd., Sichuan Rui Lu Construction Engineering Company Limited and Chengdu Sichuan to trade limited pany three companies whether personality confusion; Chengdu Sichuan crossing engineering machinery limited liability company and Sichuan Rui Lu Construction Engineering pany to Chengdu Sichuan cross industry and trade limited 西南政法大学硕士学位论文12liability company debt are jointly and severally liable; Wang Yongli, whether the individual response to Chengdu Sichuan cross industry and trade limited pany jointly and severally liable for the debts. Then the three focus of analysis, draws on case of disregarding the corporate personality, combined with the system concept and basic provisions of this. What is the meaning of this system, what is the development in history, its theoretical and practical significance in which problems are discussed in this this paper, then, introduces the current situation of the system in our country. First, is the disregard of corporate personality elements on system. Second, is the analysis of China "company law" provisions of the relevant. The last is the Introduction Company false capital, evading legal obligations, confusion of